Sunday, April 7, 2013

9 - Ideologies

By: Matthew, Evan and Alex


Introduction 

There are many different ideologies corresponding to different groups of individuals. These ideologies are based on different beliefs, values and habits that help shape our world. Even though there are many ideologies, do we, as a society, accept all of them? Capitalist companies and governments do not accept ideologies that are against or not with their own beliefs. Even though individuals have a right to speak their mind, they are not always heard. Capitalist companies and governments go against John Locke’s natural law principle, which states that people cannot violate other people’s rights to life. We are seen examples of this in the two documentaries If A Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front (directed by Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman) and L’erreur Boréale (directed by Richard Desjardins). Both of these films show different people’s ideologies about the environment and how the government and capitalist companies are not hearing their views. We hope you enjoy the blog. 


Part 1 - If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front



If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front is a documentary directed by Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman and was first released in January of2011. The film is approximately 85 minutes long and is based on a radical environmentalist group called the Earth Liberation Front. This documentary is different than most because it shows the point of view of three different groups. The first and most documented group is represented through the character Daniel McGowan who was an active member of the Earth Liberation Front. Daniel is awaiting trial for his actions on behalf of the ELF for multiple counts of arson on public buildings. The ELF began burning buildings of the companies that profited from deforestation after a string of peaceful protests went met with police brutality. The second group of people in the documentary are the business owners who are the ones cutting down the trees for profit. They get the chance to explain that what they are doing is not necessarily affecting the planet to the extent that everyone believes and that they also replace a lot of the trees that they cut down. The documentary also does a great job of humanizing the business owners by showing the damage as well as the personal responses to their buildings being destroyed. The third and final group in the documentary are the Oregon state police as well as the FBI agents who are attempting to stop the protests and arsons. The police are shown both as instigators of violence and as peace keepers throughout the film. We see the instigator side when they are forcibly removing and pepper spraying the protestors who are not acting violent. However, arson is still viewed as a crime and can also be viewed as extremely dangerous which is why it was important for the FBI to catch those responsible. Dan eventually left the ELF when he thought their ideas were getting too radical. In the end, many members of the ELF were caught and sent to jail and in Dan’s case; he was branded as a domestic terrorist.

                  

Throughout the entire documentary there is the question of the legitimacy of democracy in the United States. Democracy states that every person is supposed to have an equal say, yet in If a Tree Falls we see only the rich and powerful people are the ones who decide the fate of the forests. John Locke argued that society has the right to revolt when the law is inadequate and violent and the ELF strongly believes that the government is being unfair. It also brings up the debate of ecology versus capitalism or the love of nature versus the love of money. The film shows the protestors trying to save the trees and nature and then the businessmen who are attempting to make a living. This ties in to the concept of ideologies that everybody has. Ideologies are a set of beliefs or values that a person or a group of people have. We see multiple ideologies throughout the film and many of them begin to clash with each other. First of all, there is the clash between the protestors and the business men, but there is also a clash of ideologies between the peaceful and violent protests. Some of the protestors such as Daniel took more drastic measures in order to get their messages heard. What comes with ideologies is the idea of integrity. Integrity is when your personal values can change depending on the situation in front of you.. The character which embodies this concept would be Jake Ferguson who pretty much founded the Earth Liberation Front. In an attempt to save himself Ferguson tricks his other members into confessing to their crimes so he would get less jail time. He betrayed his friends and dropped his personal values in a stressful situation.

Here is a link of an interview with Marshall Curry director giving his input on the situation in Oregon. The idea of the media is supposed to be to keep the people informed and do so in a politically correct way. Today, many people feel that the media is doing an inadequate job at being a public service.







Here is a link of an interview with Marshall Curry director giving his input on the situation in Oregon.




Part 2 - L'erreur Boréale 


L'Erreur Boréale is a documentary film produced by Québec singer Richard Desjardins and Robert Monderie in 1999. The documentary lasts 70 minutes and it was filmed in the Province of Québec. This film is about the problem of deforestation that we are facing today in Québec. Most of the province’s population might not know it, but the forest is a public place and if we were to divide it, each individual would have the equivalent of 20 baseball fields of land. What is shocking in this film is that the Government has sold these parcels of land to forestry companies without consulting the population first. Since the birth of our country, forestry has been the pillar of our economy. In the past, companies stayed close to the shore of rivers, where they were working, because it was easy to cut trees and heave them into the water. Thanks to the fact that trees are less dense than water, the water would transport the trees to the mill and then transform them into either paper or other wooden resources. With the constant evolution of the market plus the lack of wood, companies had to move away from the shore and created roads that go through the forest itself. Their main goal now was to clear the forest to make the most profit. Richard Desjardins being curious about the companies behaviour, he went to go see the minister of the environment (Léopold Gaudreau) and learned that the minister has no control over the forest because of Bill 150. Thanks to this Bill, companies can now cut whatever they want in the condition that they plant trees in places where they cut. This is paid with the money of the public. Some people would say that it's a good deal but it's not. Indeed a forest has diversity and that makes it possible for a complete ecosystem to live but if we cut all the trees down and only plant some new trees, it would be impossible for all the animals to come back. Animals live in these grown trees that are being cut down. When Richard Desjardins goes to a forest companies meeting he asks a question about the regeneration system used by the companies and the only answer that he gets is: "Question niaiseuse" (stupid question). It shows us that companies don't care about the threat that they're inflicting to forests because it seems like all they care about is profit.

That's where the Ideology comes in. By living in a democratic country, everyone should be on the same level and should be able to decide whether or not selling our resources is a good thing for our province. Private companies should not decide for the faith of our public goods because they only care about their own interest. If we look at it more closely, the forestry companies are breaking the natural law that prevents people or industries to violate other people properties. As a society it's our duty to make sure that those rights are not threatened. We can also ask ourselves the question, is it more important to make money or to protect our environment knowing that a small amount of people makes profit of our common goods? The major problem would be the clash of the ecologist ideology against the capitalist one. One promotes the protection of the environment at any price and the other promotes the profit making.


http://m.ledevoir.com/non-classe/37010/la-gestion-de-la-foret-quebecoise-erreur-monumentale-ou-fraude-fiscale-gigantesque
Movie of L'erreur Boréale

Part 3 - Reflection of the Two Movies



These two environmental documentaries show us of individuals who work nonstop to try and help the environment. These individuals only represent a small percentage of people in our communities and countries that are concerned with environmental threats. We know that there are many environmental threats but what are we doing to help our planet? We can ask ourselves what do we do individually to help the planet. Do you recycle? Do you compost? Even if we do these two things, are we doing enough? Can we do more? There are individuals, like Daniel McGowan, who take of the labels from cans and recycle them. There are individuals like Richard Desjardins who go to forest companies meetings and bring up environmental issues. Environmentalists teach us that we could do more than just recycle and compost to help our planet. You don’t have to do extreme things to help out the environment but if everybody puts a bit more effort and does a bit more work, then we would be able to help save our planet significantly.

These documentaries teach us about tree cutting and how it has a significant impact on the environment. Tree companies cut down thousands of trees a year to help their businesses and industries grow. Based on the documentaries L’erreur Boréale and If A Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front, these companies do not care about how many trees they cut down but they only care about how much profit they get. They teach us that companies are more interested in capitalism and getting that extra money than not cutting down as many trees. This doesn’t happen in one area of the world, deforestation is happening all over the United States, Canada, the Amazon and many more places. Even when environmentalists like Daniel McGowan and Richard Desjardins bring up issues of deforestation, nobody listens to them.

Environmentalists try and transform our vision that our environment and tree numbers are falling apart significantly. The news and newspapers don’t bring up this issue like they should. Politicians and companies make everything seem like what they are doing is ok and we believe them because we are dependent on stuff made by trees. We are dependent on material like paper, toilet paper and nose tissues. We do not think about deforestation and tree issues more than we should because most people want paper, chairs or other wooden materials made out of trees. Environmentalists are trying to tell us that we have to change the number of trees we cut down because next thing we know, there will not be enough trees to make our paper or chairs.



The message that these two documentaries are giving us is that we cannot look at environmental issues later in the future. We have to look at them now. If individuals try harder to make a difference now, we may be able to save our environment. “We won’t have a society if we destroy the environment.” (– Margaret Mead). We have to act now.  


Conclusion 

Different Ideologies come from different individuals. We, as humans, all have the right to express our own opinion. Even if some people do not like your opinions and beliefs, do not let these people change who you are. In these two documentaries, we were able to see individuals fighting back in what they believe. Daniel McGowan and Richard Desjardins are great examples of people who fight back. We should all learn from these two gentlemen. We hoped you enjoyed out blog entry and we hope that you learned a lot about Ideologies and about the documentaries.